<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Peoria Pundit on WordPress.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>News, Politics and Media from the River City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by Billy Dennis</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>The only people who knows for sure are the people who were there, if in fact there is a &quot;there&quot; there. The man who mentioned it in his anti-McCain book doesn&#039;t name his sources, which is, of course, his right.

Cindy McCain -- a woman of considerable financial means -- doesn&#039;t seem like the sort of dishrag who would stick around with a verbally abusive man.

But under the rules in which many Republicans and Democrats operate, spreading scummy rumors like this is OK, because there&#039;s rumors out there about YOUR guy, it&#039;s OK to spread rumors THEIR guy.

And just one more question, Scott. Do you REALLY think McCain &quot;offers up&quot; his wife? It was a joke.

Feh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people who knows for sure are the people who were there, if in fact there is a &#8220;there&#8221; there. The man who mentioned it in his anti-McCain book doesn&#8217;t name his sources, which is, of course, his right.</p>
<p>Cindy McCain &#8212; a woman of considerable financial means &#8212; doesn&#8217;t seem like the sort of dishrag who would stick around with a verbally abusive man.</p>
<p>But under the rules in which many Republicans and Democrats operate, spreading scummy rumors like this is OK, because there&#8217;s rumors out there about YOUR guy, it&#8217;s OK to spread rumors THEIR guy.</p>
<p>And just one more question, Scott. Do you REALLY think McCain &#8220;offers up&#8221; his wife? It was a joke.</p>
<p>Feh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by sctobrien</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>sctobrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Billy,

Go to the link, look at the tapes that are available and then come back and tell me that a presidential candidate who offers his wife up for such a display is humor.  On top of that, do a little research and find out the sickening word McCain once called his wife - but I guess you&#039;d find that to be humorous too.

I think your skin is getting thinner and thinner as time goes by - as does your ability to ever admit to errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy,</p>
<p>Go to the link, look at the tapes that are available and then come back and tell me that a presidential candidate who offers his wife up for such a display is humor.  On top of that, do a little research and find out the sickening word McCain once called his wife &#8211; but I guess you&#8217;d find that to be humorous too.</p>
<p>I think your skin is getting thinner and thinner as time goes by &#8211; as does your ability to ever admit to errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Google Maps &#8217;street view&#8217; images to old, too innacurate by CP</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-google-maps-street-view-images-to-old-too-innacurate/#comment-1816</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=469#comment-1816</guid>
		<description>PI,

The other day I needed to send a letter via overnight UPS.  The drop box nearest to my office was recently removed, so I needed a backup.  I saw on UPS.com that there was another drop box on the way home, but as it was in a residential neighborhood it seemed odd to me.  Not that I shouldn&#039;t trust the accuracy of UPS.com, but hey I didn&#039;t have time to fuck around.  So what did I do?  Googled the address with streetview and confirmed it with my own eyes.  There it was.  This my friend is an example of the practical application of streetview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PI,</p>
<p>The other day I needed to send a letter via overnight UPS.  The drop box nearest to my office was recently removed, so I needed a backup.  I saw on UPS.com that there was another drop box on the way home, but as it was in a residential neighborhood it seemed odd to me.  Not that I shouldn&#8217;t trust the accuracy of UPS.com, but hey I didn&#8217;t have time to fuck around.  So what did I do?  Googled the address with streetview and confirmed it with my own eyes.  There it was.  This my friend is an example of the practical application of streetview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics: A memo about talking points by diane vespa</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/politics-a-memo-about-talking-points/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>diane vespa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=474#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>Your no fun. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your no fun. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by Billy Dennis</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>sctobrien: I&#039;d buy imto your criticism, except for the fact that you have recently demonstrated an &lt;a href=&quot;http://obriensbriarpatch.blogspot.com/2008/08/john-cindy-mccain-buffalo-chip-beauty.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inability to recognize humor&lt;a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sctobrien: I&#8217;d buy imto your criticism, except for the fact that you have recently demonstrated an <a href="http://obriensbriarpatch.blogspot.com/2008/08/john-cindy-mccain-buffalo-chip-beauty.html" rel="nofollow">inability to recognize humor</a><a>.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>My initial response to seeing the title was indignation, but after reading it A) it seemed a bit strawman/amateurish and flaky; and B) it didn&#039;t seem like the style I&#039;m used to reading around here.  At that point I decided Bill was nowhere near this stupid.  Then the comments threw me off, hence the inquiry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial response to seeing the title was indignation, but after reading it A) it seemed a bit strawman/amateurish and flaky; and B) it didn&#8217;t seem like the style I&#8217;m used to reading around here.  At that point I decided Bill was nowhere near this stupid.  Then the comments threw me off, hence the inquiry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by sctobrien</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>sctobrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Billy,

Well, you certainly got me, but with that, I think you need to work on your sarcasm skills.  For one thing, for sarcasm to be effective, it needs to be clear.  On top of that, you often run rants about how the so-called liberal media sweeps junk under the rug.  So I&#039;m not surprised people read your little post as your legitimate opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy,</p>
<p>Well, you certainly got me, but with that, I think you need to work on your sarcasm skills.  For one thing, for sarcasm to be effective, it needs to be clear.  On top of that, you often run rants about how the so-called liberal media sweeps junk under the rug.  So I&#8217;m not surprised people read your little post as your legitimate opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: PJS columnist a &#8216;caveman?&#8217; No, just observant (UPDATED) by Sam Bush</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-pjs-columnist-a-caveman-no-just-observant/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=470#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Just about every sportswriter I ever met, with the exception of a couple of women, was a &quot;caveman.&quot; That doesn&#039;t necessarily make them bad guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about every sportswriter I ever met, with the exception of a couple of women, was a &#8220;caveman.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t necessarily make them bad guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by Billy Dennis</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>Diane, I wanted to test how this information would be filtered through ideology. Several recent posts prompted responses that were mostly talking points and spin.  In other words, a lotta &quot;yeah, but Clinton ...&quot; and &quot;yeah, but how much did they take from the oil companies&quot; and so forth.

I hope I embarrassed a few people into thinking first, and jerking knees second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane, I wanted to test how this information would be filtered through ideology. Several recent posts prompted responses that were mostly talking points and spin.  In other words, a lotta &#8220;yeah, but Clinton &#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;yeah, but how much did they take from the oil companies&#8221; and so forth.</p>
<p>I hope I embarrassed a few people into thinking first, and jerking knees second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media: Damn liberal media &#8230; by diane vespa</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/media-damn-liberal-media/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>diane vespa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=471#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>Good one Billy. I smelled a rat... that&#039;s why I stayed away from this one. Heh heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one Billy. I smelled a rat&#8230; that&#8217;s why I stayed away from this one. Heh heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
